Scope is a charitable company with objectives for the promotion of equality, diversity, independence, and health of disabled people, especially those with cerebral palsy.
In 2013, the trustees asked the executive to review their care homes with the aim of identifying which ones least supported disabled people to live independently in the community. As a result, the trustees took the decision to 'exit' 11 of their 35 care homes by either closing them or by changing the services provided by the homes. This would take place over three years.
The Commission was approached by members of the public who were concerned that the trustees were not properly taking into account the wishes or needs of Scope's beneficiaries. Whilst the Commission maintained that it is for the trustees of a charity to direct and plan its strategic direction, the profile of Scope and the impact that the closure of care homes would have on beneficiaries meant that the Commission wanted assurance from the trustees that their decisions had been based on sufficient and appropriate evidence and that they took into account all relevant factors at each stage of their decision making.
The trustees cooperated with the Commission's enquiries and the Commission was satisfied that Scope had:
In addition, the trustees regular reports and updates from the executive allowed them to maintain oversight and control. Key decisions were taken by the trustees and not the executive.
Whilst the Commission appreciated that the closure of care homes is likely to be a difficult and controversial process, it has been made clear that it is for the trustees of a charity to determine how it carries out its charitable objectives following a proper decision making process.
In light of this, trustees should: