These are to take effect from 6 April 2017 and are as follows:
Currently someone is deemed domiciled for IHT laws if they have been UK tax resident in at least 17 out of the previous 20 years. They will no longer be able to use the remittance basis charge from their sixteenth year of residence.
Current Position
Individuals who are domiciled in the UK are liable to IHT on all their worldwide assets, subject to reliefs and exemptions. However, individuals who are neither UK domiciled nor deemed domiciled for IHT purposes (non doms) are only subject to IHT on assets they own in the UK. Foreign assets owned by non-domiciliaries are excluded from the scope of IHT (such assets are referred to as 'excluded property').
As IHT is only charged on UK property held by non-doms, it is relatively easy for non dom to own property through an offshore vehicle so as to secure an IHT advantage on UK property in a way not available to a person domiciled in the UK. This is referred to as ‘enveloping’ the property: the offshore company owns the UK property beneficially and the individual owns the shares of the company.
Proposal
The government intends to amend the rules on excluded property so that trusts or individuals owning UK residential property through an offshore company, will pay IHT on the value of such property in the same way as UK domiciled individuals. The measure will apply to all UK residential property whether it is occupied or let and of whatever value.
IHT will be imposed on the value of UK residential property owned by the offshore company on the occasion of any chargeable event. This would include:
Proposed changes builds on the existing measures introduced to discourage ownership of UK residential properties through companies:
Under the present IHT regime many non doms would not consider de-enveloping because the cost of ATED does not outweigh the current benefits of the envelope and in the case of let property, ATED does not apply anyway.
The proposed IHT charges on top of the ATED charges may lead to an increase in non-doms taking properties out of corporate structures and putting them into personal ownership known as 'de-enveloping'. Whilst de-enveloping may now be more attractive, there are likely to be CGT and potentially other tax issues in taking the property out of the corporate structures.
CGT implications
Where a property which is subject to ATED is sold or transferred out of the company, it may be subject to ATED-related CGT at 28%. This would only apply to a gain arising on the disposal based on the number of days the property was subject to ATED as a proportion of the relevant ownership period (from 6 April 2013 to the date of disposal).
The extent that any gain by the offshore company is not taxed to ATED-related CGT it may be subject to Non-Resident CGT attributable to any chargeable gain since 6 April 2015.
SDLT
If the property is de-enveloped, and the property is the only asset and there are no liabilities other than the share capital, HMRC has said in its recent guidance that no SDLT will be charged. However where the property is subject to a loan, there may be SDLT implications.