
Category Tag

- News
David Gazzard joins our Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence team
12 May 2026VWV is delighted to welcome David Gazzard as a partner in its Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence team.

- Articles
Supporting you through clinical negligence claims
08 May 2026Most people would find complaining about medical treatment very difficult. For many, this can feel particularly hard if the treatment was provided by the NHS and therefore 'free'. However, mistakes do happen. Often, they can be corrected and no harm is done. Sadly, some medical mistakes can have serious, life-long consequences.
In those cases, legal action may be the best way to help you secure the financial support you need to move forward, even if in a different way than before.

- Articles
Unlocking development sites: land appropriation explained
08 May 2026Land appropriation is increasingly being used by local authorities and developers to unlock sites for development. In this article, we explain how the appropriation process works, the statutory framework behind it, and how Section 203 powers can assist where development is affected by private third-party rights.

- Articles
Collective consultation duty arises earlier than point of final decision in insolvency context
07 May 2026The Employment Appeal Tribunal has clarified that the duty to collectively consult may arise where redundancies are a likely outcome of a developing situation, even if the employer is still pursuing alternatives such as a potential sale.

- Articles
Scope of protected conversations clarified and limits on tribunal approach to improper conduct
07 May 2026The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has confirmed that section 111A protection is claim-specific and emphasises the need to assess alleged improper conduct in the round, not just by reference to what was said in the meeting.

- Articles
Tribunal erred by rejecting a gender reassignment claim where the claimant's name differed on the ET1 and early conciliation certificate
07 May 2026The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that a tribunal failed to properly consider whether a claim should be rejected solely because of a mismatch between the claimant’s name on the ET1 and the early conciliation certificate, where the discrepancy arose from a lawful name change.






