A six-month pilot study on the benefits of a four-day working week has recently concluded. 92% of participating employers have said they will continue with the new working pattern.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has found that a tribunal was wrong to dismiss a claim for discriminatory constructive dismissal, having failed to reach a finding on each of the claimant's arguments.
The European Court of Justice has given its preliminary ruling in a case concerning the dismissal of a Data Protection Officer whose data protection duties conflicted with his other position as chair of his employer's works council.
A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision acts as a reminder for employers to consider pension scheme implications at the earliest possible stage when planning redundancies.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has provided a useful demonstration of the practical impact of engaging a low-paid term-time only (TTO) worker on a year-round contract.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has offered guidance on how to interpret the Supreme Court judgment in a recent case, in the context of an employment status dispute.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has found that the outcome of a flexible work appeal caused an employee disadvantage or detriment for the purposes of her indirect sex discrimination claim.
A recent Court of Appeal judgment has provided a useful insight into the scope of the principle that justice should be administered in public and be fully reportable.
An employee is pursuing High Court proceedings against her former employer, after it accessed thousands of her private WhatsApp messages to use in its defence of Employment Tribunal proceedings.
An employer has been found to have directly discriminated against an employee by providing inadequate toilet facilities in comparison to those provided to male staff.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has announced government plans to address concerns about illegal working, including hiring an additional 200 Immigration Enforcement staff.
An Employment Tribunal has found an employer did not discriminate when it sacked an employee who refused to comply with its mandatory face mask policy.
