The judgment has significant implications for employers of the following categories of staff:
The Supreme Court has confirmed that due to the wording of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (Regulations), these workers are entitled to 5.6 weeks unreduced statutory holiday. There is no scope within the Regulations for employers to reduce their statutory holiday entitlement on a pro-rata basis in order to account for the fact that part-year workers do not work all year round.
In handing down its decision, the Supreme Court has acknowledged its judgment will favour part-year workers, who will now receive a proportionately higher amount of holiday pay in comparison to their year round counterparts.
Workers need to be paid for the 5.6 weeks' holiday entitlement based on their normal 'week's pay'. This calculation will depend on whether individuals have standard or variable hours, but use of a percentage approach (which is widely used and had been in line with former ACAS guidance) will no longer be legally compliant.
In light of the decision, employers are likely to need to review their contractual arrangements and holiday pay calculations for term-time only and part-year workers. If holiday pay has historically been underpaid, it may be necessary to pay up to two years' back pay in order to correct the underpayment. We can provide advice tailored to your organisation's specific circumstances as required.
We are in the process of reviewing the full judgment and will shortly provide a more detailed comment and FAQs.