on Thursday, 07 January 2021.
The pace of change throughout 2020 was rapid and the resilience of school business models and finances was tested like never before. Although the vast majority of schools re-opened in September, and are continuing to demonstrate the resilience of the sector, sadly a number closed permanently prior to the start of the 2020/21 academic year.
Whilst there is much good news at the moment, particularly in relation to the development, approval and roll-out of Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, it would be naïve to think that there will be no more bumps and shocks going forward. So it will be wise for schools to keep strategy review at the top of their agendas. This really should not be seen as a sign of weakness, but just a very sensible and pragmatic approach.
Schools have always needed to keep their general strategy under review and the most successful schools have been those who:
All schools should note this and take a similar approach.
Strategic change for a school can take different forms. This can include:
The remainder of this note will focus on options three and four.
A sale to a group is not something new and has been occurring for many years. Most of the groups which operate on a commercial basis will have at least one school which used to be operated by a charity. However, the frequency of those sales has increased over the past decade.
There are several advantages to this option. In particular a group of schools:
Any transaction involving a sale of a school by a charity to a commercial group will be structured as a sale of business and assets. This will involve:
The asset purchase agreement is likely to contain a suite of warranties - contractual promises about the school and its affairs - which, together with the remainder of its terms, will often be subject to detailed negotiation. The inclusion of warranties may also mean that a disclosure letter needs to be prepared to protect the position of the selling charity.
In addition - as a change of proprietor will have occurred as a consequence of the transfer - it is likely that a material change will have occurred and therefore prior consent of the Department for Education will be required. If a school has a Child Student and/or Student licence from UK Visas and Immigration in place, a fresh application for a new licence will need to be made following completion of the transaction.
The governors of a school will always be under a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the charity and its beneficiaries, and therefore must be reasonably satisfied that the commercial terms agreed are appropriate. However, on the assumption that the sale of most schools will involve a disposal of a property interest, it should be noted that the provisions set out in s 117-121 Charities Act 2011 will need to be complied with and therefore either a supporting report from a suitably qualified surveyor or prior written consent of the Charity Commission will be required.
In any event, the commercial terms will need to involve sufficient cash being paid at completion to repay any outstanding borrowing so that the assets of the school can be sold on an unencumbered basis.
A new development we have seen is the consideration of innovative structures used as part of the approach to school strategy.
One of these has been joint ventures between charities and commercial investors in relation to the ownership and operation of schools. These are still rare - we are only aware of a handful of successful transactions of this nature in the UK - but we have seen partnerships of this nature for many years now in the context of franchise schools operated overseas and, of course, sales of schools by charities to commercial groups were considered very unique at the turn of the millennium and are now very common.
There is flexibility as to how a joint venture arrangement of this nature could be structured. We would anticipate, however, that the most likely structure would involve:
The advantage to the charity is that it would continue to have some involvement in relation to the operation of the school and, on the assumption the school makes a surplus, it can receive a proportion of any profit as a dividend.
In addition to drafting and amending the documents which would be used in relation to a sale to a group, there will also be the need for a shareholders' agreement to govern the relationship between the charity and investor as shareholders. This will include a number of practical matters but will also contain minority protection rights for any minority shareholder, which may include veto rights in relation to certain issues.
As with any joint venture arrangement, it is important to consider:
This type of arrangement will not be suitable for all schools and probably require investors with a particular outlook and mind-set, but is nevertheless a development that broadens the range of strategic solutions available to schools.
It is clear that governors are now comfortable that discussions with commercial groups and investors are a viable strategic option available to them. This no doubt relates to the fact that they do need to operate schools as businesses in order to create a firm financial platform, and create a surplus in order invest in the fabric of the school and safeguard the school's position into the future.
In addition there is also an acknowledgement that it is best if strategic decisions can be taken as early as possible, from a position of strength - the range of options reduces significantly when financial pressures are too great.
The good news is that the range of commercial solutions and business models available to schools are broader than they have ever been, and that whilst charitable status can add a layer of complexity, these not be an obstacle to a good commercial solution that strengthens the school and puts it in the best possible position to face future challenges head on.
This article was originally published in Independent Insight in January 2021.