
Articles
- Articles
Decisions decisions - what does recent OfS regulatory activity mean for university decision-making?
30 Jun 2025The OfS regulatory case report and record fine issued to the University of Sussex for breaches of management and governance conditions of registration E1 and E2 has brought University decision-making and compliance with governing documents into the spotlight - in the wider context of freedom of speech and academic freedom obligations.
- Articles
What the Immigration White Paper means for universities
30 Jun 2025On 12 May 2025, the Government published a white paper, Restoring Control over the Immigration System. The paper sets out a comprehensive plan to reduce net migration through a more restrictive and compliance-focused approach which will have far reaching implications for the higher education sector’s international offering.
- Articles
The Employment Rights Bill: What do universities need to know?
30 Jun 2025As the Employment Rights Bill continues to work its way through Parliament, universities should be considering how the shift towards stronger protections for individuals will affect them and what changes they need to make to their existing practices and procedures.
- Articles
Collaborating in times of crisis: what do higher education providers need to know?
30 Jun 2025The UK Higher Education sector is facing a financial crisis. Real-term declines in tuition income, volatile international student enrolment and increasing operational costs are placing HE providers under acute pressure. In response, collaboration between HE providers is being explored as a means to maintain viability.
- Articles
EAT clarifies approach to assessing disability in neurodivergent job applicant case
27 Jun 2025A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision offers important clarification on how tribunals should assess whether a neurodivergent individual meets the legal definition of disability.
- Articles
No duty to make adjustments without a realistic prospect of success
27 Jun 2025The EAT has confirmed that employers are not required to make adjustments that are unlikely to overcome the disadvantage experienced by a disabled employee.