The DfE is currently conducting a number of consultations, with the aim of providing clearer and more consistent guidance, and to propose changes, on safeguarding, behaviour, exclusions and admission appeals.
We have provided the links to each consultation and a brief summary of key changes below.
Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE)
This consultation seeks views on proposed new statutory guidance on KCSIE. Annex F (pages 168 to 171) contains a table which sets out the substantive changes being proposed, and we encourage you to read this in full. Access the main consultation page and online survey response form here.
The term 'peer on peer abuse' has been renamed 'child on child abuse'.
An explicit requirement that all governing board members receive appropriate safeguarding and child protection training (including online safety) at induction which is regularly updated has been included.
There is now heightened responsibility on governing board members to ensure online safety is an integral part of the whole school approach to safeguarding.
It is clarified that schools are responsible for checking safeguarding and child protection policies and procedures of other bodies using school premises, regardless of whether they deliver services to the school's pupils.
The job description for the DSL has been moved to Annex C to encourage governing board members to read it in full.
The DfE has also asked additional questions on the sharing of nudes/semi-nudes and the use of filtering and monitoring systems.
Below are some key points to take from the proposed new behaviour advice:
National minimum expectations of behaviour - These have been set out, and schools are told they should develop and implement a 'behaviour curriculum' that teaches pupils what successful behaviour looks like, rather than just listing prohibited behaviour. Schools must have designated trained staff to deliver strategies to support pupils after a sanction has been imposed, to help them understand how to improve their behaviour.
Pupils with SEN and/or disabilities (SEND) - There is a section on how schools should differentiate/adjust behaviour rules for these pupils, taking into account their equality duties, and duties under the SEN regime. Unfortunately, we consider this section does not yet adequately reflect the legal requirements schools must meet, in particular in respect of pupils with behavioural disabilities (eg ASD, ADHD). Failure to do so can lead to discrimination claims.
Removal from classrooms - This covers situations often referred to as isolation, seclusion or internal exclusion, and the guidance makes it clear this will be a serious sanction only to be used where necessary. It is not to be confused with the use of nurture/sensory rooms as a strategy to meet specific needs. Guidance is included on setting this out in the school's Behaviour Policy, and when and how it should be used, reviewed and monitored by the school/governing board.
In-school behaviour units - This is described as a planned intervention taking place in small groups outside of normal lessons with the underlying ambition to improve behaviour, maintain learning and successfully integrate pupils into mainstream classes. Guidance is given on its use, and there should be a visible presence from school leaders to make the unit an integral part of the school.
Preventing recurrence of misbehaviour - There is a more comprehensive section on what schools strategies/interventions schools should adopt to help pupils manage their behaviour and reduce the risk of suspensions and permanent exclusions going forwards.
Key points to take from the proposed new exclusion guidance (proposed to be called 'Suspension and Permanent Exclusion from maintained schools, academies and pupil referral units in England, including pupil movement') are:
The phrase 'fixed term exclusion' has been replaced with 'suspension' throughout, mirroring information published on DfE web pages during the pandemic (although the change from 'permanent exclusion' to 'expulsion' was subsequently abandoned).
The Headteacher's power to withdraw a suspension or permanent exclusion that has not yet been reviewed by the governing board has been removed. Separately, it is confirmed that the governing board now has the power to direct reinstatement in all suspensions, even where the total has not exceeded 5 school days, or 15 school days and the parents have not made representations or requested a meeting.
Parents must be notified of a decision to suspend or permanently exclude without delay, and no later than 3 school days after the decision, an extension to the previous requirement. Initial notification should be in person/by telephone so that parents can ask questions, followed by formal written notification with some of the mandatory information only being able to be sent electronically with the parent's written agreement in advance. Virtual School Heads and social workers must also be notified (see below).
It has been made clearer that schools must consider whether applying the Behaviour Policy to a pupil with a protected characteristic (including those with disabilities manifesting in misbehaviour) and/or SEN without adjustment/differentiation is discriminatory under the Equality Act 2010 or not consistent with SEN duties. This will include consideration of what reasonable adjustments/SEN provision have been put in place.
Schools may use online pathways (eg Google Classroom) to deliver education during the first 5 school days of suspension/permanent exclusion (where it is not possible to arrange alternative provision prior to the sixth day, which is encouraged). Meetings and hearings to review exclusions might be able to be held virtually.
This section has been expanded to make it clearer that any decision to send a pupil home, or not allow them to attend school, must be dealt with as a suspension or permanent exclusion, and that schools must not pressure parents to elect home education or find another school to avoid a permanent exclusion - evidence of this will lead to an inadequate Ofsted judgement.
The requirement to hold a re-integration meeting has been reinstated. However, the pupil should not be prevented from returning if the parents are unable or unwilling to attend. Schools should work with pupils to understand and improve their behaviour after a suspension.
This can only be used as a way to improve future behaviour, not as a sanction, and the nature of this intervention, its objectives and the timeline to achieve them, with regular reviews, should be clearly defined and agreed with the other school or AP provision upfront, with the pupil continuing to receive a broad and balanced education. Statutory guidance on alternative provision must be followed.
This is described as a permanent transfer after a pupil has attended a proposed new school under an off-site direction, following a review that has established they should remain there on a permanent basis. They are voluntary and must be agreed with all parties - any evidence of coercion could result in it being deemed to be off-rolling, with an inadequate judgement by Ofsted following. Where the pupil has an EHC plan, the statutory process to amend the EHC plan must be followed.
Where the pupil has additional needs, a disability and/or an EHC plan, the school should in partnership with others assess the suitability of their provision, and consider what additional support or alternative placement is required. Where the pupil has an EHC plan, the LA should be contacted early and an emergency annual review requested, so a review of the support package can take place.
Schools should involve their DSL, and the Designated Teacher should liaise with the pupil's Virtual School Head and the pupil's social worker at an early stage. The Virtual School Head and/or social worker must be invited to Governors' Discipline Meetings and Independent Review Panel Hearings, and may make representations. Information about their role at these meetings/hearings is included.
The new guidance suggests that the governing board must convene a meeting even where the total has not gone over 5 school days (although there is no specific time limit for this) and do have the power to direct reinstatement. It also states that the governing board can choose to review an exclusion where the total has not exceeded 15 school days even if the parents have not made representations/requested a meeting. In all cases, the governing board has the power to direct reinstatement, as stated above.
The guidance has been considerably expanded to include, for example, guidance on witnesses and witness statements and other evidence. It is made clearer that permanently excluded pupils are entitled to know the substance behind the reason for their exclusion, including access to the evidence. Character witnesses may also be permitted to give evidence at the hearing.
The proposed changes are comprehensive, and the above is not an exhaustive list of key points. We encourage you to read the consultation and both proposed new advice/guidance documents in full, and to consider submitting a response.
The proposed changes are simply to allow admission appeal hearings to be held remotely (by telephone or video conference) as well as in person, and to allow admission appeal hearings to continue with just two panel members where the third panel member needs to withdraw, thereby retaining some of the flexibility brought in temporarily during the pandemic, with less restrictive requirements.
The consultation closes on 3 April 2022.
If you have any queries, or would like to discuss any of the information provided above, please contact Joanna Goddard in our Regulatory Compliance team on 020 7665 0805, or complete the form below.