The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has confirmed that the refusal to allow circuit-judges to remain in an older, more favourable pension scheme, was not discriminatory on the grounds of part-time working.
We have woken up today to the news that Labour has won the general election by a landslide. The new government is likely to make significant employment law changes.
The Court of Appeal has told a group of contractors that they are not able to bring claims of indirect race discrimination against the end-user of their services.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that a tribunal erred in finding that a dismissal was fair in the absence of consultation over a redundancy pool of one.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld the Tribunal's decision in a claim about an employer's refusal to grant a permanent employment contract to a fixed-term employee.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has found that a Tribunal was correct to strike out a claim for disability discrimination due to a waiver in a settlement agreement.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has found that the Tribunal adopted incorrect reasoning in a claim about an employer's strict policy on unauthorised leave.
In a recent decision, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has offered a reminder about the importance of considering redeployment before dismissing a disabled employee.
The EAT has found that an employer could not rely on an agreement with a third-party provider to withdraw a lifelong travel benefit from its employees without breaching their contracts.
A recent decision has confirmed that employers can be liable for victimising employees who previously made protected disclosures, even though the decision-makers were not personally aware of the history.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a decision that a bank had no actual or constructive knowledge of a former employee's neurodiversity, which was diagnosed several years after his employment ended.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has found that a group of claimants was not entitled to re-introduce an issue determined at a past preliminary hearing in which they did not participate.
